Was Pet’s Owner Liable for Common Law Negligence?
Francisco Murga sued to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained as a result of an encounter with a dog owned by Richard Yarusso. Yarusso moved for summary judgment dismissing Murga’s complaint. Supreme Court granted the motion. Murga appealed.
Murga testified at his deposition that he was walking in the street for exercise, when the dog ran from Yarusso’s property into the street and pushed him to the ground. The dog did not bite Murga. Murga described the dog as acting like “a big puppy” and thought that the dog was trying to play with him. By contrast, at his deposition, Yarusso testified that his dog was running in his front lawn to catch a ball that the he had thrown; the dog did not go into the street or have contact with the Murga; and that he believed that Murga tripped upon seeing his dog.
Continue reading