Category Archives: Personal Injury

Neighbors Sue Each Other at Park Towers Co-Op

This was originally posted on the SGR Blog.

Did Facts Support Claim of Emotional Distress?

Occasional disputes between neighbors are a common occurrence of residential cooperative/condominium life. But, as a recent case illustrates, the Court may have to decide if an alleged course of false complaints and hallway confrontations constituted a legally cognizable claim for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.

In two actions, next-door-neighbor shareholders of a Manhattan co-op were at loggerheads. Danielle Toussie, Michael Toussie, and Deborah Touisse sued the cooperative corporation, Park Towers Tenants Corp., alleging that the Board was wrongfully attempting to terminate their proprietary lease based on false complaints of loud noises and music emanating from their apartment.

Continue reading

Was Garden City Tennis Court Sprinkler Head Cause of Player’s Accident?

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Court Adjudicates Village’s Negligence Liability for Fractured Elbow

On November 2, 2016, Kathleen Noonan was playing doubles tennis on court number 4 at the Garden City Recreational Tennis Complex. The tennis complex is a public facility that is owned, operated and maintained by the Village of Garden City. Noonan testified at her oral deposition that as she was playing tennis, she had to back pedal in an attempt to get in a position to return the ball. She indicated that she back pedaled past the baseline and raised her racket back to hit the ball. At that point, her left foot went into a depression and her heel became caught on a sprinkler head, causing her to fall to the ground. She testified that she was later diagnosed with a fractured elbow, amongst other injuries. Noonan testified that the sprinkler head on which she tripped was located approximately 4/5 of the way from the baseline toward the back screen/curtain.

The Village moves for an Order granting summary judgment and dismissing the complaint on the grounds that: (1) Noonan assumed the risk of injury inherent in the sports/activity of tennis; (2) the Village did not have actual or constructive notice of the alleged defective condition; and (3) the alleged defective condition of the tennis court was de minimus, and thus not actionable.

Continue reading

Trial Court Denies Application For Cellphone Of Driver Killed In Car Accident

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Appeals Court Decides If Access to Phone Should Be Granted

­­­Kristie R. Tousant filed a negligence action, individually and on behalf of her son, Anthony J. Farrell, seeking damages for injuries sustained by Farrell when the vehicle he was operating collided with a school bus. The bus was operated by John M. Aragona and owned by Central Square Central School District (CSCSD). The accident left Farrell in a vegetative state.

During discovery, Aragona and CSCSD moved for production of, and information from, Farrell’s cell phone, seeking to determine whether he was using the phone at or near the time of the accident. The Supreme Court denied the motion insofar as it sought production of the phone, but granted the motion to the extent it sought cell phone records from Farrell’s service provider. Aragona and CSCSD appealed.

Continue reading

Apartment Tenant Trips Over Drain Cover

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Were Owner/Managing Agent Liable For Injury?

“Res ipsa loquitur” is a legal principal that concludes that negligence occurred by the mere happening of an event. For example, an object falling from a building and injuring an innocent pedestrian. The elements of the concept are: the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation or instrument that caused the injury; the injury would not have ordinarily occurred but for the defendant’s negligence; and the plaintiff’s injury was not due to his/her own action or contribution. And, as a recent case illustrates, the doctrine applies to common and mundane accidents and injuries.

Entrice Valdez was injured when she was a resident of a halfway home in a building owned by Upper Creston, LLC, and maintained, managed, operated and controlled by Geo Reentry, Inc. and Cornell Companies, Inc. Valdez stepped on a drain cover on the floor. The drain cover then collapsed under her foot, causing her to twist her ankle and fall.

Continue reading

Patron Allegedly Assaulted by Security at Lounge in Queens

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Were Owner/Operators Liable for Injury?

Marcos Illescas alleged in his complaint that he suffered personal injuries after he was allegedly assaulted both inside and in front of a restaurant located at 95-35 40th Road in Queens, City and State of New York. Illescas asserted causes of action for negligent hiring, retention, and supervision against Sabor Latino I, Corp., Sabor Latino Corp., Sabor Latino Events Corp., Sabor Latino Lounge, Inc. and “ABC Security Company” (a fictitious name, real name unknown).

The Sabor’s moved for an order granting summary judgment and dismissing the causes of action against them for negligent hiring, retention, and supervision. The Sabor’s contended that they did not owe Illescas a duty of care with respect to the incidents that allegedly occurred. Specifically, they argued that they were not responsible for the alleged assault because they contracted with an individual who was responsible for hiring and managing the security staff for the premises and the person that Illescas claimed assaulted him was not their employee.

Continue reading

Did Producer Strike Photographer on Set of “Donovan”?

This was originally posted on the SGR Blog.

Court Addresses Viability of Battery Claim

Sherwood Martinelli alleged that, during the course of filming the show “Ray Donovan,” Liev Schreiber intentionally struck him, making contact with his person and destroying personal property. The first cause of action alleged that Showtime Networks Inc. and The Mark Gordon Company d/b/a Entertainment One failed to supervise with reasonable care, was negligent in its hiring of Schreiber, and failed to take any precautions to prevent an attack. The second cause of action alleged that he intentionally struck Martinelli and destroyed personal property.

Martinelli moved for summary judgment on the battery cause of action. He asserted that, at the time of the incident, he was lawfully on a public sidewalk on Lydecker Street, in Nyack, New York, in an area which was beyond the set. He alleged that Schreiber became infuriated with him and yelled at him to get out of his line of sight prior to shooting a scene, and that Schreiber became increasingly infuriated and then, without provocation, charged Martinelli in an aggressive and threatening manner, “while ducking and weaving, like a prize fighter, ultimately striking [him] with [his] upper body while swinging to knock [his] camera.”

Continue reading

Pizza Deliveryman Pulled Over For Broken Headlight

This was originally posted on the SGR Blog.

Was Domino’s Liable For Officer’s Injury in Scuffle?

On June 9, 2016, Kevin R. Allum was employed by Domino’s Pizza, LLC and was delivering pizza in Brooklyn. At about 1:00 a.m., New York City Police Department Officer Benjamin Maldonado pulled over Allum’s vehicle and cited him for a defective headlight. During the course of the traffic stop, Allum allegedly kicked his feet, flailed his arms, and resisted arrest. Maldonado forcibly removed Allum from the vehicle and both Maldonado and Allum fell to the ground.

Maldonado sued Alum and Domino’s to recover damages for personal injuries. Domino’s subsequently moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that Allum was acting outside the scope of his employment at the time of the incident, and that Domino’s did not know, or have reason to know, that Allum would engage in a struggle with a law enforcement officer. Maldonado opposed the motion, contending that there were issues of fact regarding whether Allum was acting outside the scope of his employment at the time of the incident. The Supreme Court denied the motion. Domino’s appealed.

Continue reading

Police Car Strikes Bike Rider at Islip Intersection

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Did County, PD, and Officer Have a Defense?

Ramon Antonio Ramos sued the County of Suffolk, the Suffolk County Police Department, and Police Officer Christopher Vitale to recover for personal injuries he allegedly sustained as a result of a motor vehicle-bicycle accident.

The accident allegedly occurred on December 18, 2017, at approximately 4:18 p.m., in the marked crosswalk at the intersection of Third Avenue and Union Boulevard in Islip, New York, when a SCPD vehicle, operated by Vitale, attempted to make a left turn from westbound Union Boulevard onto southbound Third Avenue. The vehicle struck Ramos’ bicycle, which was traveling eastbound on Union Boulevard in a marked crosswalk.

Continue reading

Courier Injured in Fall in Premises Leased by FedEx:

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Was Out-of-Possession Landlord Liable for the Injury?

Julia M. Frenza sought monetary damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on September 18, 2018, when she tripped and fell due to a crack in an interior floor of premises owned by Four State Commercial Developers LLC (FSCD).  At the time of her accident, Frenza was working as a courier for Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) at the premises, which was leased and operated by FedEx as a warehouse. The accident occurred inside a facility in an area used to house vehicles. Frenza claimed that FSCD was negligent in failing to properly maintain and repair the interior flooring.

FSCD contended that it could not be held liable for Frenza’s injuries, since it was an out-of-possession landlord with no on-going presence at the premises and with limited access to the premises under its lease with FedEx. In addition, FSCD argued that the lease made FedEx solely responsible for the repair and maintenance of the interior ground where the allegedly hazardous condition was located. Finally, FSCD claimed that the crack in the ground did not constitute structural damage for which an out-of-possession landlord would normally be responsible. FSCD moved to dismiss the complaint.

Continue reading

Was Hunter Negligent in Causing His Brother-in-Law’s Death?

This was originally published on the SGR Blog.

Or Did Victim Assume the Risk of Accidental Shooting?

On June 8, 2018, Todd Herrington, his son Devin, John Tompkins (Todd’s brother-in-law), and Robert Westcott were in Bearn, Quebec, Canada on a fishing and hunting trip. Each of them had a designated area for hunting that was a significant distance away from the others.

Patricia Harrington, as Administrator of Todd’s estate, sued Tompkins (her brother), for negligently causing Todd’s death. Patricia moved for summary judgment.

Continue reading